why do the libros not mach the cine ?

When libros are adapted into movies, the portrayal usually isn't too accurate. So, this is to be expected.

With the Twilight books, each of them are 500 pgs o more, and an average screenplay is 114 pages o somewhere around there. Squeezing all the book pages into 100+ pages is hard to do. However, the screenwriter for the Twilight cine fails to convey the emotions of the book.

Also, the director is to blame as well. Their vision is incorporated into their filming and production; their camera shots and how they want the scene to viewed, editing, etc.

Also, the actors are to blame as well. They sometimes understand their character, and play it to how they think the character is portrayed, but since the fans interpret the characters differently and to their own accord, it's hard for the actors to please everyone.

And, typical Hollywood. Hollywood manages to skew things. Pimps it up, sells eye candy. Whatever they think will sell.

Because the book has más detail, and the directors try to visualize how the movie is gonna be

There are just too many details in the book. They cant fit it all in the film. All cine based off libros are like that...

idk?????

Because they don't have the same description!

b/c supposedly libros has way too much to put into the movie and they had to cut it a lot to include things that were not in the books

I don't think there was ever a movie that was the perfect match to the book it was based off of, not even the Stephen King films and I amor SK's work endlessly. :(

cuse sometimes da libros r 2 loong so they cut out da non important parts so yeah

TEE HEE!