Okay so I was browsing the net and I found this lovely piece of work, that was published just two months ago. link
Apparently this is a 'student run' new site. So much for the plagiarism policy. Like at least give an exact link--as your site automatically generates for anyone who copies and pastes your work. But don't worry I already put that up parte superior, arriba myself, out of respect. Anyhow I find it very funny how professionally set up this site is and yet they're utilizing my work without my permission and without even linking me to it. It's one thing to post my work (with credits) in appreciation of it behind my back and another to critique it behind my back. I'm not saying not to disagree with me at all, because really, I don't mind. What I am saying is, at least have the decency to link me to the critique so I have a chance to defend myself. That's my main issue with this article. The lack of professionalism is killing me and this site claims to be the site of a newspaper. "The Record and its staff encourage a respectful, engaging and informative conversation." Yeah, okay, sure lol. Where's the respect? With that in mind I am going to link this to the site so they can properly give feedback about their work being utilized. I mean I suppose I'm somewhat flattered that, that silly articulo drew enough attention to get a whole response articulo on another site, but still...it's the way the response was done behind my back that I'm not flattered by.
So what baffles me the most is that (what seems to be) a rather professional newspaper took an articulo of mine that wasn't even supposed to be professional in the slightest and utilized it. Legit, that articulo of mine was only there to get my opinion out there and encourage/welcome people into any fandom. To let people know that it's okay to not know everything about a certain medium. I don't get why people have to take a positive like that and try to push a negative.
With all of this in mind Imma type this articulo just how I typed the other one; without a degree of professional language because that's not what the first one was. Because again, most all of my opinion artículos are recreational things, things I type just because I want something to do.
The first point I'd like to address is the following "Sure, I might like something a lot, but I’m not going to consider myself a fan right away. Why? Because I feel like I don’t know enough about what I’m trying to become a fan of." Alright, that's cool. tu do you, but don't try to tell others how to feel o make them feel unwelcome/unequal in the fandom. Just because tu don't feel comfortable considering yourself a fan right away, doesn't mean other people can't. In my opinion it's perfectly fine to call yourself a fan as soon as tu start to enjoy something because that's what being a fan is.
por definition (taken from here; link)) "is a person who is enthusiastically devoted to something o somebody, such as a band, a sports team, a genre, a book, a movie o an entertainer. As long a person genuinely enjoys something and shows some enthusiasm, por definition they are a fan. Take out the enthusiasm and you're still a fan, you're just a casual fan. Someone who watches and enjoys the subject but isn't super crazy about it. And a causal fan is still a real/true fan.
So yes, if tu don't feel right calling yourself a fan (and I apply this to any reader not just the person who this articulo is a response to) then tu don't have to. But there are some people who feel comfortable doing so and it's perfectly valid to do so. Because even if tu don't know a lot about the thing tu just started to like, tu can still like and enjoy it. And that is a fan.
The other point that was bought up was the following; "Some “fans,”consider themselves bandwagoners. These individuals openly admit they are fans of something because it is what’s popular at the time." por all means, this is a fair point. But these are not the people my articulo was addressing. For one, these people openly admitted they weren't true fans. My articulo aimed to edificación, aumento en el nivel people who genuinely amor the subject but were told they couldn't be a fan because of xyz. Bandwagoners aren't real fans they're bandwagoners. And they admit it.
Which leads to my siguiente point; I'm under the impression that my articulo wasn't even read fully. Because the point was terribly missed. I read through all of the "Being a fan Isn't Easy" articulo and not once was it mentioned that people were getting told they weren't real fans for opinions regarding the medium they love. The entire point of my articulo was to dispute claims like "you're not a real fan because tu like the antagonists better than the protagonists." I am a huge fan of Winx Club; I've been a fan for well over ten years now. I know my shit. And yet someone got off on calling me a 'fake fan' because I preferred one dub over the other. This is what my articulo was, in a sense, calling out. And the response articulo didn't address this at all. I feel as though they read my “Step one: enjoy/love/like the show, book, movie, and/or band. Good job, that’s it, you’re a true fan.” And just stopped. So por all means the articulo in response to mine isn't even a fair assessment of my original content. Considering how much of it was ignored. Considering the very core of it was ignored.
So the siguiente thing bought up is the following; "You know, the people that when tu mostrar them a cool new band, they don’t think much about them, but as soon as the band starts getting airtime on the radio, they claim to know every word to every song?" Isn't this a form of bandwagoning though? Since the band is getting air time they jump on?
tu know what, Imma defend these people. To be honest it did annoy me when Gangnam Style started playing and suddenly everyone was a kpop fan. But
Everyone needs to start somewhere. And I think the above is a start of some sort. No, they shouldn't claim to know every line to every song right off the bat. But it's completely fair for the person to say they are a fan of and like what they did hear. And from there the rest of the knowledge comes naturally. No one has to put in tedious research, why would they? Because eventually (especially with shows) the viewer starts to get used to the mostrar and slowly he/she finds him/herself realizing that he/she can lista off every member of the cast and who they play! Way back in 2011 I dived into the Once fandom; it was really disorienting because not only did I have to keep track of all the characters but I had to keep track of which fairy tail counterpart belonged to who. And I came into the fandom late. Luckily everyone was supportive and instead of saying I wasn't a real fan they helped remind me of who was who. Soon enough--without even realizing it--I not only had the counterpart thing down, but also which cast member played who down. And I didn't do a speck of research, I just listened to my fellow fans talk. I followed their conversations, and it came naturally.
So por all means, it really is that easy!
That said, onto the siguiente point; "There has to be something más to it than just enjoyment."
I suppose this is just a matter of opinion. Because I strongly disagree. Being a fan is all about enjoying something. In fact I'm inclined to point tu back to the very definition of the word fan. It says nothing about research/knowledge and everything about enjoyment.
"In order to be a fan of something, tu need to have done your homework on it." No. No, no, no. Being a fan should not require homework! That's what school is for. Sure if it's something tu enjoy it shouldn't be a hassle. por all means when I got into avatar I wanted to know everything I could about my favorito! character, Azula. But what about the people who just want to watch the show? That's it, they like/love the mostrar but they really don't want to part-take in the fandom o anything. Are tu saying that these people don't actually like the show? That they're not fans?
I'd like to argue that (again especially in the case of shows & books) the information is all and research tu need lies in the content of the show/book. If it doesn't than the autor isn't doing his/her job.
And just how much do tu need to know? If knowledge is what defines what it takes to be a fan then who gets to set that bar? Some people would say that to be a real fan tu have to know the names of all the characters, the siguiente guy will step it up and demand that tu know all of the characters and the actors who play them. The person will say that tu have to know all of that and the names of all the episodes. So whose standard of how much knowledge tu need to be a fan are we going by? Because that, my friends, is subjective too. And there's a simple solution to this problem; let the individual him o herself decide when he o she is a fan of something. Gauge whether o not someone is a fan of something por how much they like the show/book/band/etc.
"But if tu want to be considered a fan, tu should be reading, watching, attending, listening, and/or participating in whatever your interest is as much as possible." Now this is something I can agree with. Because that's all it takes; watching thew show, listening to the music, o whatever. Just making time for watching/listening to/etc. the subject shows that you're a fan. Where I differ is that I don't think that there is a such thing as a 'lazy, lackluster' fan, just a casual fan. And a casual fan is still a real fan.
Long story short, I just don't understand why people are so keen on making watching shows, lectura books, listening to music, and generally enjoying something such a chore. It really doesn't have to be. Isn't the point of shows/books/music to give people a release. To give people an escape. A way to relax. And it's pretty hard to relax and get invested in a mostrar when people are telling you, tu have to hardcore know everything about it. o when people are playing bouncer at the door of the fanclubs. Just welcome people in with open arms and mostrar them the works of the fandom! Like jesús Christ.
Apparently this is a 'student run' new site. So much for the plagiarism policy. Like at least give an exact link--as your site automatically generates for anyone who copies and pastes your work. But don't worry I already put that up parte superior, arriba myself, out of respect. Anyhow I find it very funny how professionally set up this site is and yet they're utilizing my work without my permission and without even linking me to it. It's one thing to post my work (with credits) in appreciation of it behind my back and another to critique it behind my back. I'm not saying not to disagree with me at all, because really, I don't mind. What I am saying is, at least have the decency to link me to the critique so I have a chance to defend myself. That's my main issue with this article. The lack of professionalism is killing me and this site claims to be the site of a newspaper. "The Record and its staff encourage a respectful, engaging and informative conversation." Yeah, okay, sure lol. Where's the respect? With that in mind I am going to link this to the site so they can properly give feedback about their work being utilized. I mean I suppose I'm somewhat flattered that, that silly articulo drew enough attention to get a whole response articulo on another site, but still...it's the way the response was done behind my back that I'm not flattered by.
So what baffles me the most is that (what seems to be) a rather professional newspaper took an articulo of mine that wasn't even supposed to be professional in the slightest and utilized it. Legit, that articulo of mine was only there to get my opinion out there and encourage/welcome people into any fandom. To let people know that it's okay to not know everything about a certain medium. I don't get why people have to take a positive like that and try to push a negative.
With all of this in mind Imma type this articulo just how I typed the other one; without a degree of professional language because that's not what the first one was. Because again, most all of my opinion artículos are recreational things, things I type just because I want something to do.
The first point I'd like to address is the following "Sure, I might like something a lot, but I’m not going to consider myself a fan right away. Why? Because I feel like I don’t know enough about what I’m trying to become a fan of." Alright, that's cool. tu do you, but don't try to tell others how to feel o make them feel unwelcome/unequal in the fandom. Just because tu don't feel comfortable considering yourself a fan right away, doesn't mean other people can't. In my opinion it's perfectly fine to call yourself a fan as soon as tu start to enjoy something because that's what being a fan is.
por definition (taken from here; link)) "is a person who is enthusiastically devoted to something o somebody, such as a band, a sports team, a genre, a book, a movie o an entertainer. As long a person genuinely enjoys something and shows some enthusiasm, por definition they are a fan. Take out the enthusiasm and you're still a fan, you're just a casual fan. Someone who watches and enjoys the subject but isn't super crazy about it. And a causal fan is still a real/true fan.
So yes, if tu don't feel right calling yourself a fan (and I apply this to any reader not just the person who this articulo is a response to) then tu don't have to. But there are some people who feel comfortable doing so and it's perfectly valid to do so. Because even if tu don't know a lot about the thing tu just started to like, tu can still like and enjoy it. And that is a fan.
The other point that was bought up was the following; "Some “fans,”consider themselves bandwagoners. These individuals openly admit they are fans of something because it is what’s popular at the time." por all means, this is a fair point. But these are not the people my articulo was addressing. For one, these people openly admitted they weren't true fans. My articulo aimed to edificación, aumento en el nivel people who genuinely amor the subject but were told they couldn't be a fan because of xyz. Bandwagoners aren't real fans they're bandwagoners. And they admit it.
Which leads to my siguiente point; I'm under the impression that my articulo wasn't even read fully. Because the point was terribly missed. I read through all of the "Being a fan Isn't Easy" articulo and not once was it mentioned that people were getting told they weren't real fans for opinions regarding the medium they love. The entire point of my articulo was to dispute claims like "you're not a real fan because tu like the antagonists better than the protagonists." I am a huge fan of Winx Club; I've been a fan for well over ten years now. I know my shit. And yet someone got off on calling me a 'fake fan' because I preferred one dub over the other. This is what my articulo was, in a sense, calling out. And the response articulo didn't address this at all. I feel as though they read my “Step one: enjoy/love/like the show, book, movie, and/or band. Good job, that’s it, you’re a true fan.” And just stopped. So por all means the articulo in response to mine isn't even a fair assessment of my original content. Considering how much of it was ignored. Considering the very core of it was ignored.
So the siguiente thing bought up is the following; "You know, the people that when tu mostrar them a cool new band, they don’t think much about them, but as soon as the band starts getting airtime on the radio, they claim to know every word to every song?" Isn't this a form of bandwagoning though? Since the band is getting air time they jump on?
tu know what, Imma defend these people. To be honest it did annoy me when Gangnam Style started playing and suddenly everyone was a kpop fan. But
Everyone needs to start somewhere. And I think the above is a start of some sort. No, they shouldn't claim to know every line to every song right off the bat. But it's completely fair for the person to say they are a fan of and like what they did hear. And from there the rest of the knowledge comes naturally. No one has to put in tedious research, why would they? Because eventually (especially with shows) the viewer starts to get used to the mostrar and slowly he/she finds him/herself realizing that he/she can lista off every member of the cast and who they play! Way back in 2011 I dived into the Once fandom; it was really disorienting because not only did I have to keep track of all the characters but I had to keep track of which fairy tail counterpart belonged to who. And I came into the fandom late. Luckily everyone was supportive and instead of saying I wasn't a real fan they helped remind me of who was who. Soon enough--without even realizing it--I not only had the counterpart thing down, but also which cast member played who down. And I didn't do a speck of research, I just listened to my fellow fans talk. I followed their conversations, and it came naturally.
So por all means, it really is that easy!
That said, onto the siguiente point; "There has to be something más to it than just enjoyment."
I suppose this is just a matter of opinion. Because I strongly disagree. Being a fan is all about enjoying something. In fact I'm inclined to point tu back to the very definition of the word fan. It says nothing about research/knowledge and everything about enjoyment.
"In order to be a fan of something, tu need to have done your homework on it." No. No, no, no. Being a fan should not require homework! That's what school is for. Sure if it's something tu enjoy it shouldn't be a hassle. por all means when I got into avatar I wanted to know everything I could about my favorito! character, Azula. But what about the people who just want to watch the show? That's it, they like/love the mostrar but they really don't want to part-take in the fandom o anything. Are tu saying that these people don't actually like the show? That they're not fans?
I'd like to argue that (again especially in the case of shows & books) the information is all and research tu need lies in the content of the show/book. If it doesn't than the autor isn't doing his/her job.
And just how much do tu need to know? If knowledge is what defines what it takes to be a fan then who gets to set that bar? Some people would say that to be a real fan tu have to know the names of all the characters, the siguiente guy will step it up and demand that tu know all of the characters and the actors who play them. The person will say that tu have to know all of that and the names of all the episodes. So whose standard of how much knowledge tu need to be a fan are we going by? Because that, my friends, is subjective too. And there's a simple solution to this problem; let the individual him o herself decide when he o she is a fan of something. Gauge whether o not someone is a fan of something por how much they like the show/book/band/etc.
"But if tu want to be considered a fan, tu should be reading, watching, attending, listening, and/or participating in whatever your interest is as much as possible." Now this is something I can agree with. Because that's all it takes; watching thew show, listening to the music, o whatever. Just making time for watching/listening to/etc. the subject shows that you're a fan. Where I differ is that I don't think that there is a such thing as a 'lazy, lackluster' fan, just a casual fan. And a casual fan is still a real fan.
Long story short, I just don't understand why people are so keen on making watching shows, lectura books, listening to music, and generally enjoying something such a chore. It really doesn't have to be. Isn't the point of shows/books/music to give people a release. To give people an escape. A way to relax. And it's pretty hard to relax and get invested in a mostrar when people are telling you, tu have to hardcore know everything about it. o when people are playing bouncer at the door of the fanclubs. Just welcome people in with open arms and mostrar them the works of the fandom! Like jesús Christ.
1.SpongeBob SqaurePants
2.The Legend of Korra
3.Aaahh!!!Real Monsters
4.The Ren and Stimpy Show
5.(Impractical)Jokers
6.Resturant:Impossible
7.Family Guy
8.Pranked!
9.Tanked
10.Max and Ruby(Just to make fun of it)
11.Adventure Time
12.Regular Show
13.MAD
14.Scrubs
15.Everybody Hates Chris
16.That 70s' Show
17.All That
18.Kenan and Kel
19.My Cat From Hell
20.Dogs101
21.Ellen
22.Law and Order
23.Judge Judy
24.Judge Mathis
25.Judge Ross
26.The Wonder Years
27.My Little Pony:Friendship is Magic
28.Rocko's Modern Life
29.Phineis and Ferb
30.Hey,Arnold!
NOTE:Listed in no particular order.
2.The Legend of Korra
3.Aaahh!!!Real Monsters
4.The Ren and Stimpy Show
5.(Impractical)Jokers
6.Resturant:Impossible
7.Family Guy
8.Pranked!
9.Tanked
10.Max and Ruby(Just to make fun of it)
11.Adventure Time
12.Regular Show
13.MAD
14.Scrubs
15.Everybody Hates Chris
16.That 70s' Show
17.All That
18.Kenan and Kel
19.My Cat From Hell
20.Dogs101
21.Ellen
22.Law and Order
23.Judge Judy
24.Judge Mathis
25.Judge Ross
26.The Wonder Years
27.My Little Pony:Friendship is Magic
28.Rocko's Modern Life
29.Phineis and Ferb
30.Hey,Arnold!
NOTE:Listed in no particular order.
2.if u r on your peroid o nawt!!
3.Who tu talk 2 on the phone
4.THat tu are super jelous o other girls (or boys)
5.That tu hate most of his family.
6.THat when a crisi comes up tu will run to him
7.What yuor style is!!
8.That like to watch scary movies(LOL)
9.That tu have an internet profile.
10.AND the last your cell number!! OMG they practliy break the phone!!!
11.How smart tu are at fixing things.
GIRLS STAY KEWL,BEAUTYFUL, and if any guys try to break tht BREAK THEYRE FACe!!!!
1. Cause it felt like it.
2. mayb it wanted 2. EVR THINK OF THAT!!!!!????
3. It wanted 2 make chiken soup
4. it wanted some chiken soup.
5. it needed 2 get to the other side
6. it saw Justin Bieber (all chickens r fans of him u no)
7. on the other side of the road was a KFC
8. the ppl on his side kept asken Y did the chicken cruzar, cruz the road
9. he had reasons 2
10. he was lost
11. he wanted to make this joke
12. he wanted 2 bcome famous with this joke.
P.S. i coodnt member the rest of the original joke!lol
2. mayb it wanted 2. EVR THINK OF THAT!!!!!????
3. It wanted 2 make chiken soup
4. it wanted some chiken soup.
5. it needed 2 get to the other side
6. it saw Justin Bieber (all chickens r fans of him u no)
7. on the other side of the road was a KFC
8. the ppl on his side kept asken Y did the chicken cruzar, cruz the road
9. he had reasons 2
10. he was lost
11. he wanted to make this joke
12. he wanted 2 bcome famous with this joke.
P.S. i coodnt member the rest of the original joke!lol