Rowling has answered thsi pregunta twice, and her respuestas contradict each other a little. In a chat interview she dicho there are a thousand students at Hogwarts but on her official web site's F.A.Q, in a reply to a pregunta related to the Marauders Map, she dicho it has "hundreds of dots". Rowling has also dicho on this topic, that she is bad at thinking in numbers.
So let us fans try too.
If I counted correctly, apart from the ghosts and Peeves, Hogwarts has 17 adult staff members. We could also count the older students who get the rights to monitor the corridors and other students but they add to the staff only a little and only on one aspect. They don't take away from the teachers' responsibilities as educators, nor can they give detention o watch over them. And Hogwarts is supposed to be the finest school in witchcraft and wizardry. So, I can't see that limited staff running a thousand children in fine and quality education, nursery and discipline. Hundreds students tops and even that would be a challenge.
But how many hundreds, then?
Someone has made a calculation based on the cine in which it seems that there were 30 students in a classroom. (The other person's calculation added up to about 840 students but I think they forgot that not all the 30 were from one House, making their calculation perhaps a bit flawed.)
Now, remark that cine are only cine and may not be the truth for the books, but let me try the first figuration based on the number anyway because 20-30 is usually the size of a class:
There are many classes including students from two different Houses. Having 30 students in a classroom would make some 15 students per año per House. 15 x 7 = 105 students per House. 105 x 4 = 420 students in total at Hogwarts.
I'd think that 420 students in total is enough to handle for such a limited staff, especially for the teachers.
But if there was only 15 students per año in a House, I think it would mean that students at X año from one House would always be taking the same class at the same time. But this could be, unless the libros state something against this? I meant the basic studies - of course from the third año on some students may have optional studies that others of their año from their House don't have.
If we raised the amount of student per año in a House to 20 and kept the maximum size of a classroom to 20 students, we could have half of X-years from X-House to take one class while half of them would be on another class. This would result in 140 students per House and 560 in total at Hogwarts.
In my opinion 420 students in total would work the most realistic for some 20 adults to take care of and educate - especially as Hogwarts is supposed to be the finest school. And the number fits Rowlings "hundreds of dots". As far as I know, in public schools too the classes first put together take a lot of same classes at the same time, so X-years from one Hoise always at the same class together would be fine.
So, my conclusion is that there were:
> 15 1st years in each House. 15 2nd years in each House and so on.
> 105 students per House.
>>> 420 students in total at Hogwarts.
> Less than 20 adults to run the lot with a little help in one/some aspect(s) from a few of the older students.
EDIT// I'm leaning towards the calculations in the below comments: perhaps there were only approximately 300 students per year. But app. 400 would still be plausible. But no más than that.
So let us fans try too.
If I counted correctly, apart from the ghosts and Peeves, Hogwarts has 17 adult staff members. We could also count the older students who get the rights to monitor the corridors and other students but they add to the staff only a little and only on one aspect. They don't take away from the teachers' responsibilities as educators, nor can they give detention o watch over them. And Hogwarts is supposed to be the finest school in witchcraft and wizardry. So, I can't see that limited staff running a thousand children in fine and quality education, nursery and discipline. Hundreds students tops and even that would be a challenge.
But how many hundreds, then?
Someone has made a calculation based on the cine in which it seems that there were 30 students in a classroom. (The other person's calculation added up to about 840 students but I think they forgot that not all the 30 were from one House, making their calculation perhaps a bit flawed.)
Now, remark that cine are only cine and may not be the truth for the books, but let me try the first figuration based on the number anyway because 20-30 is usually the size of a class:
There are many classes including students from two different Houses. Having 30 students in a classroom would make some 15 students per año per House. 15 x 7 = 105 students per House. 105 x 4 = 420 students in total at Hogwarts.
I'd think that 420 students in total is enough to handle for such a limited staff, especially for the teachers.
But if there was only 15 students per año in a House, I think it would mean that students at X año from one House would always be taking the same class at the same time. But this could be, unless the libros state something against this? I meant the basic studies - of course from the third año on some students may have optional studies that others of their año from their House don't have.
If we raised the amount of student per año in a House to 20 and kept the maximum size of a classroom to 20 students, we could have half of X-years from X-House to take one class while half of them would be on another class. This would result in 140 students per House and 560 in total at Hogwarts.
In my opinion 420 students in total would work the most realistic for some 20 adults to take care of and educate - especially as Hogwarts is supposed to be the finest school. And the number fits Rowlings "hundreds of dots". As far as I know, in public schools too the classes first put together take a lot of same classes at the same time, so X-years from one Hoise always at the same class together would be fine.
So, my conclusion is that there were:
> 15 1st years in each House. 15 2nd years in each House and so on.
> 105 students per House.
>>> 420 students in total at Hogwarts.
> Less than 20 adults to run the lot with a little help in one/some aspect(s) from a few of the older students.
EDIT// I'm leaning towards the calculations in the below comments: perhaps there were only approximately 300 students per year. But app. 400 would still be plausible. But no más than that.
Matthew Lewis and Evanna Lynch have both laucnhed the upcoming release of the Half-Blood Prince DVD por releasing 1000 balloons over Londres today. This kicks off the contest that is open to anyone in the UK that is over 18, anyone who finds one of these balloons will have to simply follow the instructions on the card attached to the balloon and be entered into a prize draw which could see them winning a trip to the Deathly Hallows set!
Today, Warner Brothers announced the official release fecha of Half-Blood Prince on DVD. As previously thought, it will be coming on DVD in December, December 8th to be exact. All fans in the US can look adelante, hacia adelante to getting a copy on that day.
Today, Warner Brothers announced the official release fecha of Half-Blood Prince on DVD. As previously thought, it will be coming on DVD in December, December 8th to be exact. All fans in the US can look adelante, hacia adelante to getting a copy on that day.
I had a thought...
I'm sure I'm not the only one who is wondering how on earth Harry, Ron and Hermione could destroy all those horcruxes when Dumbledore, one of the greatest wizards ever almost died trying to destroy two of them.
And since Dumbledore and Harry really aren't the only ones who know about Voldemort's horcruxes, its possible that RAB has actually done the work for them without Voldemort realising it. Its possible that he actually destroyed all the horcruxes besides Nagini but somehow didn't live to tell anyone.
So the only horcrux that they would have to destroy would be the snake. Remember Voldemort only made Nagini a horcrux in Goblet of Fire. So she is at least one horcrux left that we know still exists.
I can't see Harry, Ron and Hermione managing to destroy 4 horcruxes without one of them dying o getting seriously injured. That could happen too however...
CAN'T WAIT TILL IT COMES OUT! 5 DAYS TO GO!
I'm sure I'm not the only one who is wondering how on earth Harry, Ron and Hermione could destroy all those horcruxes when Dumbledore, one of the greatest wizards ever almost died trying to destroy two of them.
And since Dumbledore and Harry really aren't the only ones who know about Voldemort's horcruxes, its possible that RAB has actually done the work for them without Voldemort realising it. Its possible that he actually destroyed all the horcruxes besides Nagini but somehow didn't live to tell anyone.
So the only horcrux that they would have to destroy would be the snake. Remember Voldemort only made Nagini a horcrux in Goblet of Fire. So she is at least one horcrux left that we know still exists.
I can't see Harry, Ron and Hermione managing to destroy 4 horcruxes without one of them dying o getting seriously injured. That could happen too however...
CAN'T WAIT TILL IT COMES OUT! 5 DAYS TO GO!