responde esta pregunta

Critical Analysis of Twilight Pregunta

Sparkling Skin: Predator point of view?

OK, so not many people like the idea of a vampire sparkling. Sparkles = glitter = girly = fail. Not exactly sexy and manly and thrilling. But... Stephenie Meyer made her vampiros sparkle in order to attract prey. Their prey is humans, and what do humans tend to be attracted to? Beauty. Sparkles = oooh pretty = come closer. Possibly that's how Stephenie was thinking when she decided on their sparkly skin.
What do tu think? Are the sparkles understandable with this in mind? o do tu think 'nah, the vampiros are meant to be beautiful WITHOUT sparkling, so why glitter'?
*
Oh, forgot to say, sorry if this has already been asked!
HerMelody posted hace más de un año
*
I think its another delusional unfactual thing to lure in young girls. hola I amor glitter,but not on Vampires.
Flounder13 posted hace más de un año
*
lol yes xD
HerMelody posted hace más de un año
 HerMelody posted hace más de un año
next question »

Critical Analysis of Twilight Respuestas

Asvini said:
Interesting idea. I can understand someone being ok with the sparkles on this basis.

It still doesn't work for me personally though. The Twilight vampiros are so overly powered. Just super strength alone would be enough to catch human prey, on parte superior, arriba of that they have the speed, beauty and an assortment of additional powers such as mind reading. The addition of sparkles is so pointless. tu could take away a ton of their powers and hunting humans would be just as simple. There is something so unnecessary about the vast amount of powers they have.

Also, there's the fact that I don't think there's a time in history it would have worked. These days our reaction to sparkles has mostly been mockery so I see very few people being attracted to it (not to mention the amount of mundane explanations one could come up with for it these days, meaning it wouldn't even have the allure of being mysterious) and in the past people were más fearful of mythological creatures, and would probably be más likely to fear something visibly inhuman, so it seems like simply being attractive would be más helpful than the addition of sparkles in any era.
Finally, we have to assume their powers are to help them hunt. If not, simply being attractive would be enough and they'd need no other powers. As predators they need the ability to sneak up on things (not just humans, other predators that may be a threat such as the werewolves) and sparkles makes that impossible in día time. They would be unable to sneak up on o hide from any enemy, because of their beacon-like skin, a deadly hindrance for a predator. That's why real predators evolve the exact opposite of sparkles, camouflage, because it's a survival necessity. So to me sparkles not only add nothing helpful, they actually hold vampiros back.

That's just me though, not putting down your theory, o anyone who is ok with/a fan of the sparkles :)
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
*
WELL SAID, Asvini! Very impressive.
LadyLilith posted hace más de un año
*
Great answer! I just wondered what people thought, as I was sitting and thinking about the whole 'sparkle to attract prey' thing, thought I'd ask what others think of it!
HerMelody posted hace más de un año
LadyLilith said:
I see what tu mean. But Asvini pretty much dicho everything I was going to say. I may also add that the vampiros in Twilight hide the fact that they sparkle from humans. So really, what was the point of them sparkling?
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
*
Another good point -_-' hmmm there are big flaws to these sparkles.
HerMelody posted hace más de un año
*
There are big flaws to the Twilight series in general. I apologize if you're a fan, but that's how I see it. :/
LadyLilith posted hace más de un año
*
I agree about the flaws in Twilight. Still, it's a light read that I can get into without taking it seriously o thinking too much about it lol. Sometimes it's nice to just sit down and read some nonsense, and being a Jacob and lobo fan helps.
HerMelody posted hace más de un año
Phoebe_Gabriel said:
Hmmm let me think for a minute...
Ok so vampiros that sparkle... I don't think that this helps a predator very much. tu see vampiros are attractive in their own way, they have extreme beauty, intriguing personallity, dark nature and not to mention superspeed and superstrength and only the first 3 are enough to draw a young girl in order to feed from her. There isn't that much dark in a vampire that sparkles-sorry if I offended anyone- Meyer made her vampiros not being able to resist human blood and when they taste it they can't stop drinking until they have drained the victim dry. But vampiros tend to satisfy their victims before killing them and not doing that including glittering kinda freaks out. And also if they want to hunt during the día glittering prevents them because they don't want to be exposed... but if it its like that then why do they glitter? Sparkling is más of a burden rather than a weapon.
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
*
Sorry I guess this is a little complicating...
Phoebe_Gabriel posted hace más de un año
*
I know exactly what tu mean Phoebe_Gabriel!
HerMelody posted hace más de un año
MadamOcta13 said:
I always thought-no, wait, it always has been that vampiros attracted their prey through hypnosis. NO GLITTER NEEDED!
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
Cola020 said:
The Salvatores are real vampires!
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
tdafan121 said:
The only thing that would lure in is an idiot. No offence to anyone o anything.
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
ork100 said:
I would like to think this is más complex than that. Could it be that the autor was thinking about how vampiros are immortal? Perhaps something in their cells has crystallized and that is what preserves them o whatever is in their tissues that stops decay is reflective. Sunlight causes damage to molecules, perhaps it is built in very effective suntan lotion. vampiros are meant to have demons inside them and Lucifer comes from the latin for light, perhaps it is their demonic side sparkling. Lots of fun possibilities that go beyond being pretty and glittery. I did think the scene in the film was rubbish, seriously sparkly required.
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
*
I pretty sure Meyer would have hinted towards something of that kind in the books, but good argument.
Aqua_Rose posted hace más de un año
Aqua_Rose said:
Personally, I don't think people would be attracted to the sparkles, simply because although sparkles are pretty, and enchanting, and attractive, on a living creature, particularly on a creature that is supposed to look at least vaguely human, would be rather distressing and confusing, and people are probably más than likely to either attack it o run away, both of which are in vain against a vampire. So, after that ridiculously long sentence (sorry, it's a habit of mine), I agree that the sparkling is completely unnecessary- particularly as vampiros are notoriously hunters of the NIGHT, and so their sparkles in the daylight would not necessarily be seen por their prey.
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
Book-Freak said:
I don't think they sparkle to attract prey - I think it's an effect of the transformation. In the Illustrated Guide, it says this:

'In direct sunlight, the disparity between humans and vampiros becomes más obvious. The cellular membrane of the vampire is not as soft o permeable as in a human cell; it has crystalline properties that cause the surface of vampire skin to react prismatically, giving the vampire a glitter-like shimmer in sunlight.'

So the effect of the venom in the transformation upon the human cells is the reason for the sparkling.

Also, I think they make the sparkling más noticeable in the movies. After lectura the meadow scene, I visualized the sparkling as más of a soft glimmer.
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
*
Haha, I put far too much time into thinking about that so nice to know I was on the right track. I'm not a twilight fan so haven't read the libros but I was a vampire fan in my teens, Anne arroz though, so when I saw that bit in the film it sent the grey cells ticking. It's good that the autor has come up with new ideas, boring when something made up gets to be dogma.
ork100 posted hace más de un año
next question »