---IF tu DON'T HAVE ANYTHING NICE TO SAY, THEN PLEASE DON'T COMMENT.---
---YOU CAN IGNORE THIS articulo NO MATTER HOW MUCH IT PISSES tu OFF, JUST LIKE SANMAN7'S ARTCILE---
---PLEASE READ THE WHOLE THING BEFORE COMMENTING---
Before anyone dicho anything, yes I'm wwwarea. I'm just using this account for now. Not sure why, but I think it's for the better for this. Since I don't want my gaming name on here much anymore.
It is better to remain as a separated society anyway.
It is quite possible that I could of handled the hatred from sanman7's articulo better. The way I react on walls sometimes and such could of been handled better obviously.
I guess the reason why I did it a lot sometimes was because certain people could of missed my replies.
And that Bisexual Furry Gay articulo I made. The reason why I made it was because I thought it was rude of OmegaKing to tell me that Bisexual furries don't have the right to stand up for something that actually DOES fit there identity. Bisexual people (Furry o not) are allowed to make Gay focused stories in anyway they want.
Now he thinks I've "threaten" his friends only because I wanted to defend someone's work that wasn't meant towards them.
So apparently, as a 'Bisexual' furry, I can't stand up according to him. Yet, the work was something I like (And yes that's an excuse because it's part of my identity).
Anyway, yes, there are probably better ways to handle this fight. But people wanting to calmly address rude haters in the first place is not a bad thing. How is it a bad thing? People are allowed to disagree and argue. Saying the "victims" o reactors are the one that starts it, is very messed up and non-sense..
Heh, I remember MojoOmegaWolf saying that it takes two people (Though I don't agree) to start a fight.. But sanman7 was the first person. O_O
So haters are the cause of fights after all, as MojoOmegaWolf stated himself.
I also remember MojoOmegaWolf replying to Teh for commenting rude about the sequels, he was something like "If tu don't have anything nice to say, please leave".
Just how similar I do.
--This is one reason why I have a problem with this user...--
Violating the Terms
Yes, I think I did violate it before MojoOmegaWolf violated it, Journeyer explained that link too, even though one of the users like OmegaKing misread it when he dicho "I violated the terms too" o whatever the comentario was in similar.
But was it "OK" for MojoOmegaWolf to do that back? No, if this website was a forum, I'm pretty sure the mods/admins wouldn't allow revenge.
'Two "wrongs" don't make a right'.
Yet, I never made any harassment articulo like that, most of the time it was my own criticism, and the only time I dicho "MojoOmegaWolf" (From what I can remember) was that we should reportar his comentarios (Terms dicho he can't either) whenever he does that.
Yes, the terms of service is against 'hatred'.
Well. I don't know what to say. I probably could of done it better in some parts, but I do believe wanting to address a problem involving sanman7 wasn't wrong.
Nor was that articulo standing up for furry bisexuals.
Well, many people on here don't believe in arguments and every time I go very obvious on MojoOmegaWolf and even Kira, population is there power.
Now OmegaKing threatens me the police for making a life opinion that wasn't even a threat other than the "threat" of existing, just like how Jett did to me first.
He insults my own life out of nowhere.. Do tu think tu diverse respect for that?
No tu don't.
And tu claim I'm a cyber bully and claim that my blog posts about your works "isn't" an opinion (Opinions are arguable anyway).. How is it not an opinion? It's still an opinion actually.
But I probably shouldn't of said "I hope tu die" because that CAN cause a real effect maybe.
So I say sorry, but I still wish tu were taken away por aliens o something. lol
Hey, tu hurt my life, so I do it back.
But yeah, I'm scared for "life" probably now.
But I still believe it's not wrong to address rude behavior. And yes, tu can argue for that.
Besides, even if I got banned from arguing (Not considered fighting it's self maybe), I can make another account and tu know what? I can always make 50 accounts with different IP addresses and take tu all down with me.
This idea that haters get to get away with a rude opinion on people's works, but people can't stand up back makes me really sick.
Those who blames that me criticizing them starts the fight, IS probably the haters themselves anyway.
And I find it horrifying for the horrible monsters to blame that I'm other people without pure knowledge of knowing who that person is.
But yeah, this is just sad. I was just trying to make everyone enjoy themselves personality and I just wanted to address this problem.
And this picture I found on the Internet really touched me and made my cry in joy sort of.
---YOU CAN IGNORE THIS articulo NO MATTER HOW MUCH IT PISSES tu OFF, JUST LIKE SANMAN7'S ARTCILE---
---PLEASE READ THE WHOLE THING BEFORE COMMENTING---
Before anyone dicho anything, yes I'm wwwarea. I'm just using this account for now. Not sure why, but I think it's for the better for this. Since I don't want my gaming name on here much anymore.
It is better to remain as a separated society anyway.
It is quite possible that I could of handled the hatred from sanman7's articulo better. The way I react on walls sometimes and such could of been handled better obviously.
I guess the reason why I did it a lot sometimes was because certain people could of missed my replies.
And that Bisexual Furry Gay articulo I made. The reason why I made it was because I thought it was rude of OmegaKing to tell me that Bisexual furries don't have the right to stand up for something that actually DOES fit there identity. Bisexual people (Furry o not) are allowed to make Gay focused stories in anyway they want.
Now he thinks I've "threaten" his friends only because I wanted to defend someone's work that wasn't meant towards them.
So apparently, as a 'Bisexual' furry, I can't stand up according to him. Yet, the work was something I like (And yes that's an excuse because it's part of my identity).
Anyway, yes, there are probably better ways to handle this fight. But people wanting to calmly address rude haters in the first place is not a bad thing. How is it a bad thing? People are allowed to disagree and argue. Saying the "victims" o reactors are the one that starts it, is very messed up and non-sense..
Heh, I remember MojoOmegaWolf saying that it takes two people (Though I don't agree) to start a fight.. But sanman7 was the first person. O_O
So haters are the cause of fights after all, as MojoOmegaWolf stated himself.
I also remember MojoOmegaWolf replying to Teh for commenting rude about the sequels, he was something like "If tu don't have anything nice to say, please leave".
Just how similar I do.
--This is one reason why I have a problem with this user...--
Violating the Terms
Yes, I think I did violate it before MojoOmegaWolf violated it, Journeyer explained that link too, even though one of the users like OmegaKing misread it when he dicho "I violated the terms too" o whatever the comentario was in similar.
But was it "OK" for MojoOmegaWolf to do that back? No, if this website was a forum, I'm pretty sure the mods/admins wouldn't allow revenge.
'Two "wrongs" don't make a right'.
Yet, I never made any harassment articulo like that, most of the time it was my own criticism, and the only time I dicho "MojoOmegaWolf" (From what I can remember) was that we should reportar his comentarios (Terms dicho he can't either) whenever he does that.
Yes, the terms of service is against 'hatred'.
Well. I don't know what to say. I probably could of done it better in some parts, but I do believe wanting to address a problem involving sanman7 wasn't wrong.
Nor was that articulo standing up for furry bisexuals.
Well, many people on here don't believe in arguments and every time I go very obvious on MojoOmegaWolf and even Kira, population is there power.
Now OmegaKing threatens me the police for making a life opinion that wasn't even a threat other than the "threat" of existing, just like how Jett did to me first.
He insults my own life out of nowhere.. Do tu think tu diverse respect for that?
No tu don't.
And tu claim I'm a cyber bully and claim that my blog posts about your works "isn't" an opinion (Opinions are arguable anyway).. How is it not an opinion? It's still an opinion actually.
But I probably shouldn't of said "I hope tu die" because that CAN cause a real effect maybe.
So I say sorry, but I still wish tu were taken away por aliens o something. lol
Hey, tu hurt my life, so I do it back.
But yeah, I'm scared for "life" probably now.
But I still believe it's not wrong to address rude behavior. And yes, tu can argue for that.
Besides, even if I got banned from arguing (Not considered fighting it's self maybe), I can make another account and tu know what? I can always make 50 accounts with different IP addresses and take tu all down with me.
This idea that haters get to get away with a rude opinion on people's works, but people can't stand up back makes me really sick.
Those who blames that me criticizing them starts the fight, IS probably the haters themselves anyway.
And I find it horrifying for the horrible monsters to blame that I'm other people without pure knowledge of knowing who that person is.
But yeah, this is just sad. I was just trying to make everyone enjoy themselves personality and I just wanted to address this problem.
And this picture I found on the Internet really touched me and made my cry in joy sort of.
also, i'm sorry if i sound like i'm being repetitive about this, but i just wanted to get it off my chest
1) the animación in Dino Digs was sometimes better to look at than in Norm of the North
2) Dino Digs kept its gas humor and fart/piss jokes at a minimum, and honestly, it did have some funny bits (when Norm of the North had NONE of it)
3) at least - at the very least - Kate, Humphrey and the pups are decent main characters tu can route for (unlike Norm)
4) there's no Brent o Agnes, o Freida and Fran this time around. as for Amy, she was passable (aside from her HIDEOUS design)
5) Dino Digs at least knew when to stop being crazy and nonsensical, so that the audience can take a breath. Norm of the North NEVER stopped being nonsensical and retarded
1) the animación in Dino Digs was sometimes better to look at than in Norm of the North
2) Dino Digs kept its gas humor and fart/piss jokes at a minimum, and honestly, it did have some funny bits (when Norm of the North had NONE of it)
3) at least - at the very least - Kate, Humphrey and the pups are decent main characters tu can route for (unlike Norm)
4) there's no Brent o Agnes, o Freida and Fran this time around. as for Amy, she was passable (aside from her HIDEOUS design)
5) Dino Digs at least knew when to stop being crazy and nonsensical, so that the audience can take a breath. Norm of the North NEVER stopped being nonsensical and retarded
