I think it'll depend on whether the place she disappeared to after becoming the Dark One has magic o not, but assuming it's Camelot, she'll probably start with the same physical transformations Rumple did. Slightly greenish-gold skin, but not completely scaley the way Rum's eventually becomes.
I get the feeling that she'll be able to handle the darkness a lot better than Rumple ever could, as she was literally 100% good before (with Lily the vessel for all her potential darkness), not to mention Emma was a product of true love. Not sure if that will have any effect on her personal appearance; we'll have to wait and see!
posted hace más de un año
Actually the creators are telling us to prepare for darkswan on twitter and Instagram so I am assuming she won't . Besides, Rumple wasn't nessesarily a bad man before, just a coward. So...yeah.
He wasn't bad, but Emma was born with literally NO dark potential, because of Snow and Charming putting it in Lily. So ron wasn't even, I agree, but like everyone, he was corruptable and had the potential for darkness.
tu did come up with some good reasons, but I unfortunately have to disagree. Yes, she was born without the potential for darkness, but obviously that can change. She almost turned dark a few times throughout this season, and I feel it would be just a waste if we didn't see some darkness appearing in her. Although I agree she won't be nearly as bad as Rumple, I feel we will see some darkness in her. I hope tu understand.
Oh, yeah I agree with tu there! I think we may have misunderstood each other a little... I think she'll definitely go dark this season too, just that she will be able to put up más of a fight against it than Rumple could. But yeah, I do think she'll cave into the darkness eventually, and when she does she might become even más of a villain than Rumple was.
She's going to look the same. Rumpelstiltskin looked normal while he was in Storybrooke and Neverland.
["I get the feeling that she'll be able to handle the darkness a lot better than Rumple ever could, as she was literally 100% good before (with Lily the vessel for all her potential darkness), not to mention Emma was a product of true love."]
When are some of the fans of this mostrar is going to stop being blind about Emma? She was never 100% good, despite what the Apprentice had done to her and Lily. She was a THIEF. She committed other crimes - including damage to public property, breaking and entering, and just recently, murder. She is still knowingly driving a stolen vehicle that she and Neal had stolen.
100% good my eye. Emma was already corrupt before she had stepped foot into Storybrooke. The Apprentice's spell had accomplished nothing.
posted hace más de un año
I didn't say she didn't have any character/character flaws, she just doesn't have any evil in her. That's a canon fact, take it up with the writers if tu disagree. She has never done anything with ill intent-- everything she's done of questioning morality has been either to survive o to protect the one's she loves. I'm not saying she's perfect, but she is (or at least was) completely void of dark potential.
Of course Emma had evil within her. That whole spell that the apprentice did on her moral compass was nothing but a joke. Simply having flaws don't prevent tu from becoming a thief, maintaining possession of a stolen vehicle, behaving like a thug por breaking and entering, abusing one's position as sheriff - which includes physical abuse, and committing murder. The spell did squat on Emma's moral compass. Evil was always within her, just as evil was always within everyone else.
