Recolors. They are unoriginal, art-theft and crude-looking. Many people say that. Now, I am not a big fan of recolors ( though i did one of my own when I was younger) but I do believe that they are art theft. BUT if the person who recolored the picture actually gives credit to the original creator of the artwork, then it isn’t art theft. It seems that this club has división, split into two sides and a middle ground. One side are made up of people who do recolors and think that they are ‘original’. The other side thinks recolors are ‘not original’ and that fan-characters are, and the middle ground is made up people who either do not care about the matter o just can’t decide what side to favor yet. I am one of the people in the middle ground, but not because I do not care o can’t decide, it’s because the whole ‘recolor war’ is pointless. Recolors, as I dicho before, aren’t original, right? But fan-characters ARE? I don’t think so. Mary-Sues, Gary-Sues and the like are examples of UNoriginal fan-characters that are overloaded with power o have no weakness whatsoever. The war should end soon, in my opinion, since neither side is going to give in any time soon.
~Gyro signing off~