One thing I've noticed in general is that anti's tend to make a pretty big deal out of the Twilight vampiros sparkling. I've seen people saying things like real vampiros don't sparkle, vampiros not sparkling was a fact, and that it was gay of them to sparkle. Okay, of ALL the things to criticize in Twilight, people are going after the SPARKLING? Seriously?
First off, at least where I'm from, calling something “gay” as an insult is considered really rude and distasteful. Besides being rude and homophobic, it's also generalizing and stereotyping. Just because something sparkles doesn't make it gay. I don’t know how anyone else feels about this, but I personally hate it when people use that as an insult. To me, it just makes the person saying it look bad, not the vampire in pregunta they’re trying to insult.
Next, vampiros don't exist, so tu can't say for certain whether they sparkle o not. Saying that vampiros don't sparkle is merely an opinion, not a fact, and por definition, an opinion is neither right nor wrong.
I've also heard people saying that Stephenie Meyer ruined vampires, and they seem to insist that "real" vampiros are like Dracula. I've read and heard of a lot of other libros where the authors have changed vampires, such as the House of Night Series, The Cirque Du Freak Series, etc., but I've never come across someone complaining about how they changed vampires, o complaining that they ruined vampires. From what I’ve seen, people can and will always find something to hate about almost anything, and people making such a big deal out of the MeyerPires sparkling seems as though they’re just looking for something to hate, I mean if she'd made her vampiros más traditional, people would probably be complaining/accusing that she'd ripped off Bram Stoker.
Even if tu don't like what Stephenie Meyer did with vampires, at least she came up with something new and somewhat creative. I mean, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and it’s fine if tu dislike the sparkling, and I’m not trying to change that, but it just seems like such a petty thing to make such a huge deal over.
First off, at least where I'm from, calling something “gay” as an insult is considered really rude and distasteful. Besides being rude and homophobic, it's also generalizing and stereotyping. Just because something sparkles doesn't make it gay. I don’t know how anyone else feels about this, but I personally hate it when people use that as an insult. To me, it just makes the person saying it look bad, not the vampire in pregunta they’re trying to insult.
Next, vampiros don't exist, so tu can't say for certain whether they sparkle o not. Saying that vampiros don't sparkle is merely an opinion, not a fact, and por definition, an opinion is neither right nor wrong.
I've also heard people saying that Stephenie Meyer ruined vampires, and they seem to insist that "real" vampiros are like Dracula. I've read and heard of a lot of other libros where the authors have changed vampires, such as the House of Night Series, The Cirque Du Freak Series, etc., but I've never come across someone complaining about how they changed vampires, o complaining that they ruined vampires. From what I’ve seen, people can and will always find something to hate about almost anything, and people making such a big deal out of the MeyerPires sparkling seems as though they’re just looking for something to hate, I mean if she'd made her vampiros más traditional, people would probably be complaining/accusing that she'd ripped off Bram Stoker.
Even if tu don't like what Stephenie Meyer did with vampires, at least she came up with something new and somewhat creative. I mean, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and it’s fine if tu dislike the sparkling, and I’m not trying to change that, but it just seems like such a petty thing to make such a huge deal over.
We all been asking since this culb stared who would win the fight Harry Potter o Edward Cullen. First it mattereds if Harry has is wand wish it would come avange of him in a way and if Edward had Bella o not she would come a distracing to him lets start.
Harry has is wand and Edward does not have Bella. But Edward can read his man but since he does not know what the spells do it will not help at all and Edward has got speed that will help him out alot becouse he can get a way from the spell so they both got disavanges and avanges so it just may be a tie
Harry has is wand and Edward does not have Bella. But Edward can read his man but since he does not know what the spells do it will not help at all and Edward has got speed that will help him out alot becouse he can get a way from the spell so they both got disavanges and avanges so it just may be a tie