I know tu folks are tired of hearing about crediting images. I'm not here to beat that into your head yet again. I've already done that... and I continue to do it in comentarios on your imágenes when tu forget.
No. This time I am here to give tu a helpful tip. A lot of tu have paid attention and are now putting a credit on your images. Thank tu for that! The problem now is a lack of film knowledge, which is very forgivable.
tu see, when it comes to movies, forget what I dicho earlier about crediting the website tu got the image from if tu can't find the actual owner of the image. With movies, that goes out the window.
tu see, when it comes to movie stills, the original Studio retains the rights to all imágenes from the movie.
Don't start groaning. This actually makes things easier for you! I promise!
link
That's all ya need. Oh not as a credit, but as the number one resource for finding which studio owns the rights to the movie (and the screen shots.)
No más having to copy and paste numerous websites during your mad screenshot spree. Just go to imdb and look up the studio that released the film. Bam. Done. That credit goes on all those images.
Now obviously if a shot has been artistically altered then yeah keep putting who altered it... I think.
Me, I try to go with the studio when in doubt. They are the ones with the big legal pistolas who could cause problems for fanpop in the future... and likely the person over on facebook o Myspace who put cute little words on those imágenes did not get the Studio's permission to do so. It's just safer from a legal standpoint to always credit the studio ;)
There. That wasn't so painful, now was it?
No. This time I am here to give tu a helpful tip. A lot of tu have paid attention and are now putting a credit on your images. Thank tu for that! The problem now is a lack of film knowledge, which is very forgivable.
tu see, when it comes to movies, forget what I dicho earlier about crediting the website tu got the image from if tu can't find the actual owner of the image. With movies, that goes out the window.
tu see, when it comes to movie stills, the original Studio retains the rights to all imágenes from the movie.
Don't start groaning. This actually makes things easier for you! I promise!
link
That's all ya need. Oh not as a credit, but as the number one resource for finding which studio owns the rights to the movie (and the screen shots.)
No más having to copy and paste numerous websites during your mad screenshot spree. Just go to imdb and look up the studio that released the film. Bam. Done. That credit goes on all those images.
Now obviously if a shot has been artistically altered then yeah keep putting who altered it... I think.
Me, I try to go with the studio when in doubt. They are the ones with the big legal pistolas who could cause problems for fanpop in the future... and likely the person over on facebook o Myspace who put cute little words on those imágenes did not get the Studio's permission to do so. It's just safer from a legal standpoint to always credit the studio ;)
There. That wasn't so painful, now was it?
A generic link title is about as helpful as using this picture to guess what color this person's eyes are.
Have tu ever gone to a spot and seen 3 enlaces with the exact same title? Have tu ever seen a video of an annual event and wondered if it was from this año o last years show? Gone through a whole video on a spot and wondered why it was there? The problem is generic titling. There is a very simple solution for this that I will explain to tu and help tu put into play in your everyday Fanpopping.
más generic titles might be ok for pictures (I mean really how specific can tu get with a picture.... Amy Adams...
continue reading...
Have I read this articulo before??? I just can't tell with this generic title!
My showcase on 03.11.2012
