add a link

io9: Mad Max Won All the Oscars, Except the Ones It Really Deserved

2 comments
Fanpup says...
I remember visiting this website once...
It was called Mad Max Won All the Oscars, Except the Ones It Really Deserved
Here's some stuff I remembered seeing:
There was a brief moment during the Oscars where it looked like
might be on the way to getting the recognition it deserved as a truly groundbreaking, visually stunning film. Spoiler alert: It didn’t.
won a boatload of behind-the-scenes awards—six of the seven (edited: this initially said five, it was a mistake) it was nominated for—but lost Best Director and Best Picture. Here are the
Makeup: Lesley Vanderwalt, Elka Wardega and Damian Martin
Sound Editing: Mark Mangini and David White
Sound Mixing: Chris Jenkins, Gregg Rudloff and Ben Osmo
Production design: Production design by Colin Gibson; set decoration by Lisa Thompson
All of these people did a truly amazing job making a goddamn miracle of a film. I am so glad they were recognized. And I’m also thrilled that no other movie won more awards than this one. But here’s the thing: With Mad Max being acknowledged as the year’s best in so many categories, why didn’t George Miller and the film as a whole deserve to win?
Reasonable minds can differ about the relative quality of the Best Picture nominees. There were a lot of great movies in the past year. But
was a masterpiece. It is a credit to the entire medium on every. Single. Level. The Oscars should have rewarded it, and George Miller, for doing absolutely everything right. Not most things. Everything.
is a gorgeous movie—with a bunch of important underlying messages about autonomy, sexism, climate change, greed...
has everything, executed with a grace that is frankly astonishing. This movie makes impossible things look damn easy. Even its own backstory—the years Miller and co. spent laboring to get it done, in the face of mind-blowing setbacks—exhibit the best kind of filmmaking passion. There is not a single thing that the other nominees did, that
Being angry at the Oscars is a pointless endeavor, since it’s an essentially pointless show. At the end of the day, Miller, and everyone who worked on the film, got to actually make their dream project. And people saw it, and loved it. But, goddamn, would it have been great for the people who make films to step up and acknowledge its brilliance. To encourage more filmmakers to reach as far as they did, and to achieve what might seem impossible.
Chris Rock Opens the Oscars By Proclaiming That 'Hollywood Is Sorority Racist'
Defensive Lineman Crashes Out Of NFL Combine 40-Yard Dash Due To Dick Falling Out Of Shorts [NSFW]
Chris Rock Invited Stacey Dash Onstage For the Biggest, Weirdest Troll We’ve Ever Seen
The 10 Worst Examples of Movie Whitewashing From the Last 15 Years
In a Nearly Automated World, Alice Has the Last Job on Earth
It's Been a Long Week, Celebrate Its End with the Gif Party
Kinja is in read-only mode. We are working to restore service.
read more
save

2 comments

user photo
best director should have gone to George Miller, that's very true
posted hace más de un año.
 
user photo
ESB said:
I like Fury Road, it's the only film I liked form 2015, but I've never cared for Hollywood rewarding itself with a shiny little statue. Just like I don't care if a film made or didn't make a million or a billion at the box office. None of that is what makes a movie, an actor or a director great in anyway.
posted hace más de un año.