add a link

Rachel Lefevre sues Summit Entertainment

save

10 comments

user photo
sarabeara said:
Oh please, those corporations have billions. At worst, her suing them will cause them to have to not be able to buy a frappucino maker. XD
posted hace más de un año.
 
user photo
agree wit u mandapanda......buh i wonder how this will all turn out...
posted hace más de un año.
 
user photo
angry
I HATE HER I allways have she Broke the contract if she really loved and was happy to be in the Twilight movies why the fuck would she Sign for another part shes full of Shit ohhh Dont feel Bad for her shes not upset that she lost the part as victoria shes pissed Because shes not geting payed ugh I HATE HER!!!
×/
posted hace más de un año.
 
user photo
Actually, this company is really poor compared to Warner Brothers, New Line Cinema, or Paramount. But they have gotten more money since the Twilight fans.

But either way, I'm glad she's not going to let them get away [with firing her]. She didn't break contract. Maybe a communication failure, but they could have avoided firing her. But money was they're focus. And they thought by hiring a more "famous" actress, they could bring in more money. That's true, but so what? They did it for the money. And saying that she won't get paid, when she was under contract is wrong. Therefore, I'm glad she's taking this "fued" to the next level. Summit's got to know when they passed the line. And they could have avoided this if they weren't blinded by greed.

ps. Her role for Barney's Vision is rather small. If she wasn't passionate and dedicated to the Twilight movies, then why wouldn't she sign up for bigger roles? And if she didn't care about getting fired, then why would she go through this much trouble? Summit screwed her over. And I'm glad they're getting sued. Right now, in my book, they're douches. I don't hate them, but I think they made a terrible decision. And especially since they thought they could get away with it. It's disgusting.
posted hace más de un año.
last edited hace más de un año
 
user photo
angry
I Disagree I cant Do anything Because of my modeling contract..
And trust me she would know that it would mess with the movie Eclips..
My grand father works for Summit and I have talked to him its not About money they hired this girl Because she looks alot lik Rachel...
Rachel lies and she indeed tried out for a big part in another movie..
She just Didnt get get the part She just wants money..UGH I am soo happy she got fired×/
posted hace más de un año.
 
user photo
^^You call being a wife of a man a "big" part. I mean this in no disrespect. But, there could have been faults on both sides. But Summit's still sticks out more. Yeah, maybe she shouldn't have booked another movie, but maybe she didn't know when Eclipse was to begin filming? In her contract, it said that she wasn't supposed to book major roles, and her "Barney's Vision", she does NOT have a major role. Even if she was in the wrong, Summit wouldn't have fired her if they intended to keep her. Point is, Summit wanted a "bigger" actress.
posted hace más de un año.
 
user photo
angry
That is in no way correct I Dont know where you read that...They never wanted a bigger actress...Why would they???It would just mess with the movie they picked this new girl after they let Rachel go because she looked so much like Rachel.. Rachel got what she needed she put her hand in too many cookie jars and this is what happend people now think Twilight is the worst movie ever Because of her she is soo Dum summit Did what had to be Done now she is just taking money from Summit she Deserves nothing She Didnt finish the job...So she isnt going too get any-thing shes just wasting her time
posted hace más de un año.
 
user photo
sunny
Okay, I'm gonna step in here, I agree with Mandapanda.
Rachelle, in my oppinion, is a wonderful talented actress, and she seems to be a nice person.
I can't say that I know what's going on because I just found out a couple days ago about this whole thing, but I thik Rachelle cares about the movies/books, and really wanted/wants to be in them.
Even before they were popular (obviously), she was in them wasn't she?
So why would she want to be selfish and try to get more parts and break her contract on perpose?
I don't know what's going on, but that doesn't make any sense to me.
She had it all pretty much, money, publisity, work, and she wa enjoying herself, doing something she loved.
so why would she ruin it all on perpose?
posted hace más de un año.
 
user photo
well I have met her twice my grand father loved this actress he would never let her go with-out a purpose this girl knew she could get fans from this movie she should never have got into another movie..She made a mistake NOT Summit look what a mess she caused like Twilight fans needed to get laughed at more??AGAIN she Did not finish the job she f**ked up and it came and Bit her in the ass....If she loved the Twilight movies she never would have Done this to Summit and the fans,And she is NOT trying to get the part back she just wants money thats all she ever wanted she Did try out for another part A BiG part but she didnt get it that made Summit think can we really trust this women??? And they gave her another chance look how she thanked them WTF Dont feel for this girl she lies and yes I met her I hated her she is full of her self she never should have played victoria!!
I hope all are still friends I am not trying to hurt or be disrespect you But I am trying to tell both of you the truth...I am in no way yelling at you guys
still friends???
posted hace más de un año.
 
user photo
I think she's trying to make a point, and that she doesn't want to let Summit walk all over her. And pertaining to the "BIG" part, tell me which part it was? She said that she turned down some opportunities to remain in the saga and then Summit pulls this bs on her? Yeah, the easiest way of settling that is to fire her? Um, I don't think so. They fired her because they wanted a "bigger" actress, therefore raking in more money.

I mean no disrespect either, but you don't know the truth. No one does. But, the fact of the matter is, Summit is greedy. We all should know that. They made some statements and decisions in the past that easily shows they want money. But do you seriously buy the "scheduling conflict" story? If there was a communication failure, the EASIEST thing to do is sort it out, NOT FIRE the person. It's ridiculous. The conclusion to that reasoning? Summit didn't think she was worth keeping and so, they "happened" to hire another actress with a "bigger name".

Since you're implying that Rachelle is in complete fault here, then let me ask you this. If Summit was planning on keeping her, then why would they hire Bryce Dallas Howard? The auditioning process takes time, and from the statements, firing Rachelle was a spontaneous decision. Summit must have been planning to replace her because they already had another actress lined up. An actress who is "more known". So, when they say that they are deeply saddened she won't be returning, that's bs. They had an alternate motive. And it's MONEY.
posted hace más de un año.
last edited hace más de un año