What do tu guys think about Debbie Rowe?

oh yea but she looks like Michael's daughter Paris in the face but atleast Paris came out lookin better than her mother though

Yea!! shes ugly!! i'll never imagine mike doing that butie! he had good taste!

Lisa Marie was so much better for Mike. I agree completely with julialovesMJ. :]

ohhh i see...that makes sense.

I Agree With You, Debbie is perra Forever . . . .

kind of agree...she will stay a perra for the rest of her life ...

i agree with tu memolina38. But of course, she did what michael wanted.

lol no offence to mike but then he shouldn't have got her pregnant if he didnt want to marry her.

and i agree with tu that he loved lisa marie more...you could see the amor in his eyes when he was with her but with debbie he looked kinda...sad.

Going back to the children, she's even dicho that she's not their mother, and that she only gave birth to them, as a gift to Michael. Even if this is true (which I think it is), how horrible of her to make this public statement? One day, Paris and Prince will inevitably hear, read o learn of the things she said, and it breaks my corazón to think of how it will make them feel to know that their own "mother" didn't have them out of amor o because she wanted them. I read in another interview that she spoke lovingly of her babies, fotos of whom adorned the walls of her home, and how fiercely protective of them she is - they're pictures of horses. HORSES. On parte superior, arriba of that, she legally signed away her parental rights. The original divorce settlement allowed her one visit every 45 days, though she later applied to the court herself to terminate her parental rights altogether, claiming it was in the children's best interests. In 2006, she was back in court to get her rights reinstated, for whatever reason, which they were. She claims she wants to be a part of their lives, but if she was willing to sign away her rights the first time - at ALL, for that matter - then she has no right to be a part of their lives whatsoever. She may have wanted to give Michael children, but she was also just as happy to receive her $6 million settlement from him. The only things I will give her credit for are giving Michael his beautiful children, and not putting up a fight for custody of them. I just hope she continues to stay out of their lives because they're better off without her. MICHAEL was their mother AND father, and he's all they ever needed. So yeah, I could care less about the woman. She was an incubator, as far as I'm concerned.

Hey!! girls!! can we all agree in something? This woman should come out and tell her real story with michael! WTF! we have the right to know, way so much silence? cuz of the children, she don't even loves them so what does she have to lose? Well she could do something positive instead, donate all the money she'll make of a tell all book to one of his cheraties! way not!! come one Debbie bitch!

I think at least Paris must have Debbie's genes, she looks quite like her. The eyes, nose, mouth, chin, jaw line...

And, btw... how could it be a gift when Michael paid her for it???

She is the kind of woman who loves the man más than her own children, she goes an cry's at his grave instead of crying for her children!, I mean ok, his michael jackson lots of woman would amor him deeply! but comeone, tu can't amor más a man than your own kids? WTF? BITCH!! BITCH!! BITCH!!

how do tu know that tu don't even know her none of us do she does amor her kids but she knows they are better off with their grandmother.

Why do u like her??

I read that link, and the thing with the Nanny Grace interview is a lie! Grace dicho in a statement that she never dicho those things, it was another tabloid lie.

If that Debbie interview is true, then I don't understand why she's complaining. It was she who suggested, and wanted to be a surrogate mother for Mj's children... in return for a big house and a lot of $$$. If she did that interview, she obviously did it for the money.

hot pick!!!! ^^

oooo thx

That's a good point