harry potter Surprised

meeee posted on Aug 18, 2007 at 02:31PM
Was anyone else surprised that Harry Potter wasn't set in the present.It was set in 1997 or something.
Just wondering what everyone thought.

harry potter 7 respuestas

Click here to write a response...
hace más de un año snoznoodle said…
Yeah it was supposed to be a year after each other and the first book came out in 1990 I think so that's just how it all turned out.

It was present when she published the first book.
hace más de un año berly said…
It started of in the present
hace más de un año meeee said…
Yeah I know but since it started in the present I expected it to finish in the present you don't really think about stuff like that until you see it.
hace más de un año caintil31 said…
i don't now how, but somehow i always knew it was set in the 90's. plus dudley had a playstation 1. if it was present day he'd probably have a xbox or ps2.
hace más de un año baebia said…
book 1 was released on 1997 the reason its set in the 90's cause thats when the idea first came to JK rowling...the book was not published till 97
hace más de un año tubby2002 said…
If she would have had the first book set in 1990 and the last one in the present it wouldnt have followed the timeline. It would have jumped 17 years in a 7 year period (through out the books). I dont think that it mattered that it took place 10 years ago.
hace más de un año meeee said…
Yeah I know what you mean well thanks for the help!!!!