responde esta pregunta

harry potter Pregunta

Do tu think Twilight is copying Harry Potter?(read the details first :))

Do tu think Twilight is copying Harry Potter, por splitting(i think they are anyway) Breaking Dawn into two movies, like they are with Harry Potter? (:
*
Why are they splitting BD into two movies? It's a long book but...hardly anything happend...
Mrs-Grint posted hace más de un año
*
No but they want to steel Harry Potter success and I don't really like that
clarinette posted hace más de un año
*
in a way, yes. jump on bandwagon of movie that's already popular I guess. Hollywood want to harvest as much money they can get their hands on.
ClaireVoyant posted hace más de un año
 ABDCFan- posted hace más de un año
next question »

harry potter Respuestas

cupcake219 said:
no its just a good way for film company's to make más money, spreading it out más so people have to pay more!
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
Shepard14 said:
Nah, Like the 7th Harry Potter Movie, there is so much detail that it would be a 5 hora movie....It is also a money-making decision...if someone like's the book's/movies enough, they'll pay for both. I am NOT siding with Twilight!!! I am a die-hard HP fan, I am just saying that i think it is unfair to ASSUME that they would copy. Who know's their reasons.
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
*
oh, i wasn't assuming they were copying, i just wanted to know what everyones opinions were, and whether o not they thought that Twilight was copying HP with the idea of splitting the last film into two movies. (:
ABDCFan- posted hace más de un año
*
hahaha i didn't mean to imply that tu were...sorry!
Shepard14 posted hace más de un año
*
ohh, it's fine! It's just because when tu put the capitals, i thought tu were implying that tu thought i was assuming! haha (:
ABDCFan- posted hace más de un año
*
It is my fault! I realize now that it looks that way! hahahah SORRY EVERYBODY!!
Shepard14 posted hace más de un año
HaleyDewit said:
I've seen the segundo Twilight movie and I thought it was a lot of crap.Harry Potter's still better.Nothing happened in Twilight.I almost fell asleep.
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
*
i know! i watched it online, and i just was fast forwarding because i was bored out of my mind!
laughingGrl posted hace más de un año
*
Lol. I guess, i mean, the ending, everyone was like 'awww!' I was just like 'I knew that was coming, now lets get outta here, before the mad rush arrives!' hahaa. (:
ABDCFan- posted hace más de un año
Kylie90210 said:
Maybe they are, a little bit, they probably thought, 'hey, that's a good way to leche money out of our zombie fans!' but it's not like the idea was purely the creation of Warner Brother's. I haven't seen any Twilight movies, frankly, I wouldn't waste my time, but from what I've heard online, they don't have much to do in the last book anyway, so seeing how they are gonna stretch it out should be laughable.

That said, I am not impressed that Twilight wishes to compete so much with Harry Potter, first jumping on the original HBP release date, and now releasing one of their crappy cine so soon after DH.
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
XDRoseLuvsHP said:
I think they are. First off, what could they possibly put into two movies? There were few significant things in the book Breaking Dawn. Renesmee happened, Imprinting happened, Bella into vampire happened... and that's about it. I could say the Volturi thing happened, but nothing really did happen. Just pointless build up.

In Deathly Hallows, so much happened and all of it was really vital. The Seven Potters, The Wedding, Grimauld Place, The Ministry, The Woods, Godric's Hollow, Xenophilius Lovegood, Gringotts, The Final Battle (part 1 and 2), Malfoy Manner, Snape's Memory, The Sacrifice Harry has to make, The Epilogue, all of the deaths, finding the Horcruxes and the Sword of Gryffindor of course, even Dumbledore's Story has significance. That is just to name a few. tu have to fit that into the movies, and it's ALL important.

Also, it's pretty stupid to make the Twilight cine come out RIGHT after the Harry Potter movies. Everyone knows Harry Potter cine are the most successful movie series ever, and that is not opinion. That is statistics. That will, if anything, make them lose money.

It's all just too coincidental to me.
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
*
i thin they are ecause he first was a really big pice of crap. im personally a HP fanand HP is so much más awesome!!! i mean, vamprire, love, EUGH!! hater romance movies!
lovebaltor posted hace más de un año
cpluver153149 said:
Yes they r copying Harry potter b cuz when Cedric died he went to twilight as Edward and harry potter had him first
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
potterandtdi said:
Yeah! That's totally coying. TWILIGHTS TAKING OVER THE WORLD!
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
bellagirl24 said:
NO what do vampiros and hombres lobo have to do with wizards? Besides who cares how many cine they make there awsome!
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
*
ikr!
zanesaaomgfan posted hace más de un año
*
haha. true, but hombres lobo will forever = remus lupin :)
laughingGrl posted hace más de un año
*
ikr?
ABDCFan- posted hace más de un año
*
oh! i know! lol, sorry, blank moment. And i didn't mean the content, i meant the idea of having 2 movies.
ABDCFan- posted hace más de un año
Jeffersonian said:
Why would they be copying? I mean just because they are splitting Breaking Dawn into two cine doesn't mean they're copying.
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
RealSunshine said:
I don't think they are copying!
They will división, split Breaking Down in 2 cine because
the book has lots of details.
and I don't think Twilight needs to copy,ok,harry potter is like 100 time better,but twilight is trying to reach independence and to stop being compared with harry potter
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
zanesaaomgfan said:
No they aren't. Breaking Dawn is being put into two cine because theres 2 parts. Bella's and Jacob's.
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
*
but bella has two parts in the story, and inbetween those two parts, is Jacobs bit, and i don't understand how they're gonna put it into two movies, because Bellas parts are seperated, like i dicho before, por Jacobs bit.
ABDCFan- posted hace más de un año
*
GAh 3 parts I meant,,,
zanesaaomgfan posted hace más de un año
EYBanuelos said:
Totally!
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
*
It really wasn't worth all the commotion they made about it
HaleyDewit posted hace más de un año
kayla1313 said:
yes i think they are
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
fugiami said:
honestly i think twilight is a crap movie and will never be as good as hp. i suppose they realize this and are trying to emulate hp.
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
*
Hmm, yes, i agree. (:
ABDCFan- posted hace más de un año
BellatrixCissy said:
BD had barely anything but DH has sooooo much and look at HBP 2 1/2 hours BD could be that lenght anyway stupid copiers not fair not fair not fair:(
select as best answer
 BD had barely anything but DH has sooooo much and look at HBP 2 1/2 hours BD could be that lenght anyway stupid copiers not fair not fair not fair:(
posted hace más de un año 
summerlynn1978 said:
I think that they are copying. cause breaking dawnis the last book and deathly hallows is and they r both making it into 2 movies. deathly hallows planndd that first!
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
Magatha98 said:
No, they are not copying Harry Potter.
They need to cut it into 2 parts, because cine arent supposed to be más than 2 hours, and theres alot of detail in the books, so they need to put 2 parts!
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
*
if they;re meant to be 2 hours, and thats it, why are some movies, that have been shown in cinemas like 3 + 1/2 hours long?
ABDCFan- posted hace más de un año
LadyLilith said:
Personally, I think that Twilight copies off of a lot of popular literature. I know that there's probably only so much tu can do with a vampire falling in amor with a human, but STILL...Vampire Diaries, anyone? (Please consider only the book versions, I HATE the TV series).

If you're just talking about the last movies...hmm, slightly. It seems like they are trying to outdo HP in awesomeness (which would NEVER happen :) ), but it's too subtle of a coincidence. So who knows, really?
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
*
totally agree with u:)
vanillaicecream posted hace más de un año
NCISGleek said:
No, any good film maker would do it because it gets way más detail and it would make the movie better.
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
ToxicShock said:
No I don't think they are copying. If they where then all the other libros to cine that are made into two films would be copying..example The Hobbit is going to be made into two films and I hardly doubt they would bother copying HP.
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
ScottishChic said:
No. Both j.k.rowling and Stehanie Meyer wrote a lot of things in their libros and both need a lot of them in it so, the directors need them in but they can't have like 5 hora cine can they? So, they are doing the only thing they can- make the movie into two parts, which should be pretty cool either way
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
*
I agree with tu ScottishChic. :)
Kadaj posted hace más de un año
*
Awww thank ou Kadaj, thats sweet of tu to say so xx
ScottishChic posted hace más de un año
KreachersArmy said:
Of course they are copying. They saw a good idea and they took it. Just like they are making a Twilight version of pottermore now. But unlike Deathly Hallows, Twilight doesn't have enough content to fill 2 movies. Breaking Dawn is gonna be soooo slow. I thinking that Meyers may have started the HP/Twihard comparison herself to be honest.
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
next question »