responde esta pregunta

harry potter Pregunta

pregunta about Harry Potter plothole?

tu know that basilisk fangs can kill horcruxes, and tu know that harry is a horcrux. Well, just when harry kills the basilisk, a fang sinks into his arm, so even though fawkes gave her tears, I would have thought he should have been destroyed before then?

 TangoThang posted hace más de un año
next question »

harry potter Respuestas

princesslullaby said:
But remember that the Horcrux is a piece of Voldemort's soul. While in the other Horcruxes, his soul is put into an inanimate object, therefore being the only live substance in it, and can be directly stabbed, when it's in an actual person, it's protected por the other person's soul and other life parts.
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
*
i was gonna write ta same thing....u beat me to ta puñetazo, ponche :)
Bubba38 posted hace más de un año
LadyNottingham said:
Fawkes came to Harry's rescue and shed tears so quick that the venom did not have the time to reach vital organs and kill the boy. Basilisc poison is lethal enough to kill a human body before it can even kill the soul.
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
*
Exactamundo.
BlackHound posted hace más de un año
cunha27 said:
Hmm, good question. Maybe it's not Harry himself who'd the Horcrux, but his scar?...and the basilisk fang needed to have come in contact with the scar either directly o por the poison being eventually dispersed through Harry's body o having Harry die?...I don't know...

Though if that was the case and knowing that the poison did not kill immediately, Dumbledore should have gotten some phoenix tears ready, collected a fang, summoned Harry and destroyed the Horcrux in Harry himself
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
*
I always interpreted it to mean that the horcrux was in the scar, also.
karenmiller1972 posted hace más de un año
next question »