harry potter vs crepúsculo
add a link
Harry Potter 6: Why The First 2.5 Hours Were Awesome And The Last 25 minutos Were Shit.
Harry Potter 6: Why The First 2.5 Hours Were Awesome And The Last 25 minutos Were Shit.palabras clave: harry potter, movie, 6
|
I'm a little confused about his opinion on the seventh and eighth movies. He was complaining about how much they cut out/changed in the sixth one (which was smaller and contained less plot holes), but is upset about them making the seventh book into two movies? That doesn't even make sense.
The only thing I've managed to gather is that he dislikes the seventh book because Harry didn't kill Voldemort with Avada Kedavra. If that's seriously the case, then this fellow needs to go back and read The Seven Potters again. Or, re-read the whole series because he seriously didn't get the entire point of Harry's character.
link
link
link
link
link
link
link
My dad just saw Eclipse last week, and he said that he "Had absolutely no respect for this movie. It's sick and wrong and nobody actually talks like that. It's predictable, cheesy, and how on Earth could those people on that one Fanpop page that you always talk about actually think that this train wreck is actually better than Harry Potter? Well, at least it's better than the first two."
I couldn't have put it better.
I personally thought the Death eaters exit was kind of epic. I loved how they included Bellatrix, though she wasn't in that scene in the book. XD "Yoo-hoo! Hagrid!" *sets house on fire* = FREAKING EPIC!
Also, the reason they didn't include the big battle at the end was because at the end of Deathly Hallows, there's going to be a big battle, and they didn't want the movies to be too same-y.
registrarse en fanpop para agregar un comentario