Harry Potter and the reason why I think it is, is because it is gripping right from the start. First just getting Harry to the burrow causes the deaths of many good wizards (Meyer won't kill any of the good guys to wishy washy) and soon after Harry, Hermione and Ron are on the run from Death eater. None Pure Blood wizards are required to get papers (similar to the Jewish in WWII) leaving them to find the horcruxes only to find out that they actually found one in book 5 which many people over look (one thing that proves JK Rowling actually THINKS about the libros to come) They hunt for Horcruxes in many different locations meeting Wizards and magical creatures in hiding (simlar to the Jewish in WWII) tu loose many characters which tu grow attached to as the series progresses. Ron abandons Harry's mission and comes back mostrando Friendship/love helps conquer evil. Have a heartbreaking realization that not everyone leaves war unscathed as Harry's godson has Harry fate of never knowing his parents. tu have Harry realize he must sacrifice himself not for his amor but for the sake of all the innocent. Such a huge task to have at 17 years old. Much más in depth then Meyer's characters/plot. Not only that but Harry risks his skin to save his enemy not once but 3 times. Not to mention Snapes character development absolutely amazing.
Breaking Dawn just wasn't that good. None of Meyer's book were good. They were boring full of filler. Don't really mostrar any value whatsoever. What is consider "romantic" por Meyer is simply abusive. Also I thought vampiros couldn't reproduce? Meyer is the definition of over hyped and will fade. A sparkly piece of shit may be sparkly but it is still shit.
Harry Potter's last book was so mush better, it was emotional and had a lot of action in it, I was almost crying when Bellatrix started tourchring Hermione and Ron lost it there, it shows that he would die for her and do anything, and the book was real, it had death and tears and some minor cursing =)
I have been a humongous fan of both the libros until i read their last instalments & honestly the last libros ruined everthing for the series. But if i have to chose one than i guess Deathly hallows was less damaging than breaking dawn.The later really was a disaster i.e in my opinion.
To be fair, I would actually have to say Breaking Dawn. Now I'm obviously biased for Harry Potter, as I think it's a better series, but I'm not comparing the two libros to each other, but to the rest of the series. Breaking Dawn was about the same as the other Twilight books,it was actually somewhat better written, and while I enjoyed DH a lot, I thought the other Harry Potter libros were better. I do think DH was brilliantly plotted, but the beginning WAS draggy.
Ok whoa! I amor Harry Potter. Shit. Harry Potter and Jk Rowling are the reasons why I even pick up other books. The whole HP series is over-whelming. I mean I never got tired of lectura them. I would just finish one and mover on to the siguiente without ever getting bored. JK even made them last 7! and not jus 7 short stories like the Marked series of Vampire Diaries.((Oh dnt get me wrong I amor both series)) But 7! 400 o más pages average. AT Least! But Meyers took the vampire style to a whole new genre. She on another level whn it comes to the Cullens. And I amor her libros for the new perspective. SO many series since have taken wat she has done and fabricated it to the other series we all kno and love. ((Mentioned them earlier and then some...etc)) SO while I kno Jk Rowling is the better author. And I owe my amor of libros to HP I do appreciate Twilight series as I do any other.
Harry Potter. 1: The entire plot of the story did not completely contradict statements previously made por the author. 2: The plot made sense. AND it completed the main plot of the entire series. Twilight couldn't do this because there was no plot for the entire series. 3: The last scene at the end of Twilight was the most anti-climatic thing i've ever read. Meyer was just trying to push a ridiculous, unbelievable, uninteresting happy ending. J.K. actually had an epic battle, deaths, injuries, tears, SUSPENSE. I know we all hated that those characters had to die, but it made for good literature. Breaking Dawn did not. 4: There were no pedophiles that I can immediately recall in Deathly Hallows. NUFF SAID.
HARRY POTTER. Twilight but each book is basically the same plot, Bella puts everyone in danger and then they all fix it and live happily ever after. HArry Potter is much más interesting. It is realistic, with the death, the suspense. It shows that life isn't always going to turn out happy. Also it shows the development of all the characters, and some of them change, in Twilight everyone is the same. I still amor the Twilight series but i think it can sometimes give a bad message, not intentionally though. Like in breaking Dawn how Bella is ready to kill herself for a child, that can be a good and bad message. All in all both great series, but Harry Potter is probably better.
Harry, of course! Hermione and Ginny aren't teen mothers, Harry doesn't "talk his problems out" with Voldemort (because how lame is that?), and it keeps tu wondering and your corazón racing until the last page.
Deathly Hallows, of course! It's a masterpiece, no doubt. After lectura DH i can't help but read from Book 1 all over again. Everything makes sense. JKR raised my standards to the roof! As for Breaking Dawn, i cursed SM for wasting my freaking time!
Harry Potter had the Better last book because j.k. Rowling is a better writer than Stephanie Meyer because she has had más experience because Harry potter has 7 books. Breaking Dawn was good but The Deathly Hallows was really good