responde esta pregunta

harry potter vs crepúsculo Pregunta

Do tu think Breaking Dawn being in two parts is necessary?a

I saw the similar pregunta for HP so I was wondering If people felt the same about the last Twilight movie being in two parts.

Personally, I felt most of BD was filler and two cine for it is unneeded, what do the rest of tu think?
*
Sorry about the extra a in the question, I'm typing on an ipod
AllyAM posted hace más de un año
*
Bd had almost 600 pages, i think they did well. Since there are going to be 2 cine they will include más details. The only thing i didn'i like is that the segundo movie will be in theaters in 2012. It's so long.
marthatsal posted hace más de un año
*
...is it bad that I TOTALLY forgot I made this question? xD
AllyAM posted hace más de un año
 AllyAM posted hace más de un año
next question »

harry potter vs crepúsculo  mejor respuesta

bri-marie said:
As I dicho on the other one (link), there is still a lot of necessary stuff -- too much to squeeze into a two hora movie (There was the wedding and honey moon and Bella finding out she was pregnant (it is still a romance so they aren't going to cut those parts out/down), there's the thing with Jacobs wolf-pack, the explanation (however half-assed it was) about Nessie, Irina finding out about her and running to the Volturi, there's the whole explanation about the Immortal Children, Alice and Jasper running off, the gathering (and practicing) of the other clans, and the "showdown" at the end. It's too much stuff to put into one two-hour long movie.)

Also, just like with any ending, they have to envolver, abrigo up all lose ends. While Twilight, New Moon, and Eclipse did a great job of sticking to the books, they still had to chop bits out for the sake of time and money. Now that the movie's are coming to an end, they have to go back and fill in any and all holes that were made/left from the editing.

Think about it this way: Breaking Dawn is about 760 some-odd-pages long. Harry Potter and the Goblet of fuego is a little over 730 some-odd-pages long. That's a thirty some-odd-page difference. They squeezed GoF into a two hora movie por taking out "unnecessary" parts and HP fans thought that was a bad idea because most of that "unneeded stuff" was actually needed (not only for the movie itself, but for the entire series). BD is the same way -- a lot of that "filler stuff" is actually necessary to the plot of BD and to the series as a whole.
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
*
Wow, that turned out a lot longer than I thought it would :p
bri-marie posted hace más de un año
*
That's a little long...
skinman90 posted hace más de un año
*
so yes o no?
miss_weasley posted hace más de un año
*
Obviously it's yes, if I keep saying there's too much for one movie.
bri-marie posted hace más de un año
next question »

Respuestas

sofiacalista said:
No, because length does not equal content. and there are a lot of scenes and parts that is not relevant to the mainplot, that tu can take them out and still have the story.
$$$$$$$ <---- i think is the main reason
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
*
I agree
Schnusch posted hace más de un año
*
Breaking Dawn has 192,196 words, according to Stephenie. HP Lexicon says GoF has 190,637 words.
youknowit101 posted hace más de un año
*
I bet money is the main reason to...
skinman90 posted hace más de un año
cassie-1-2-3 said:
Yes.
Use the buscar bar and find one of the anterior preguntas asking the same thing, and you'll see my explanation.

I'm mobile, making it impossible for me to copy and paste like I would have done.
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
*
Ack! Sorry for repeating! I just searched briefly and didn't see this question, my bad!
AllyAM posted hace más de un año
the-perisher said:
If HP and the Order of the Phoenix - filled with más subplots than the whole TS combined - can be edited into one movie, so can Breaking Dawn. But maybe, like HP OoP, it won't turn out to be too good. Cutting too many scenes would make it garbled, I guess.
But even then, I'm not sure it requires to be in two parts - many things that go on for pages in the book can be cut down to a few scenes in the movie.
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
*
absolutely right, most of the pages just contain the characters' musings and the descriptions of places and when tu translate it in the film it won't take that much of screentime
TheFey21 posted hace más de un año
luv_warriorcatz said:
well, it's long so yeah
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
boolander25 said:
Maybe. I dunno, I'd have to read it again.
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
xDark_Angelx said:
Even though I already answered the HP one, I'll still answer this one. I don't mind.

While some parts seem to be filler (like Jacob looking around near the end of part two of BD for a girl to imprint, although someone might find some kind of significance in that. I don't, though.), there are still lots of important things going on in the book that need to be a part of the two movies, and it'd be hard to put in just a single movie. And what with the switching perspective's of Bella, Jacob, and then Bella again, it'd be confusing in just one movie.
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
berizzle2238 said:
^^i think your wrong personally, the movie needs details to go along with the mainplot o else itd be a crappy movie. theres alot of stuff going on in the 4th book to much to put into one movie,the scenes would be sorta of rushed an squished. The más the merrier ! (:
ilovetwilight<3
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
*
LOL.
sofiacalista posted hace más de un año
*
ew...
berizzle2238 posted hace más de un año
*
i was actually talking about irrelevant subplots. Not every subplot that tu can find.
sofiacalista posted hace más de un año
*
oh, i understand what tu mean
berizzle2238 posted hace más de un año
zafi said:
Yes it does in order for the movie 2 be as good as the book.
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
miss_weasley said:
They were just copying off of what Harry Potter was doing! Harry Potter nerds UNITE!!! So NO!

Hope tu agree,-miss_weasley
select as best answer
posted hace más de un año 
*
Was Harry potter copying Stephen King o Kill Bill? They división, split their movie into two parts first.
cassie-1-2-3 posted hace más de un año
*
And Harry Potter was just copying Kill Bill.
bri-marie posted hace más de un año
next question »