Critical Analysis of Twilight
add a link
Why Edward Is Not Abusive
Why Edward Is Not Abusive
A very well-done 5 part essay about why Edward ISN'T an abusive boyfriend. I found this very refreshing to read, as I've never seen any other good rebuttals to the "abusive boyfriend" argument. She brings up some good points.
palabras clave: criticism, pro, twilight, stephenie meyer, argument, edward cullen, bella cisne, critical analysis, rebuttal
|
Also, people bring up the fact that Jacob is her best friend because, quite simply, he is! Whenever I have debated this, I always bring up the fact that Jacob is a werewolf. It's only fair. But I also bring up the fact that Edward is a vampire and yes he has years of self-control but every moment he is with her is dangerous. You only have to read Midnight Sun to see that. That's why I think Edward is just as dangerous as Jake.
She's absolutely right about blaming a lot of the characters, a lot of them are manipulative and selfish and you can't just blame Edward... The same way that a lot of the Team Edward fangirls can't just blame Jacob. They've all done extreme things.
Thanks for submitting this! :)
If someone hit you for a considerably valid reason - it's still abuse. It just may not leave the abused person feel as bad as they would in non-valid case.
If someone kidnaps you and holds you captive against your will, it's psychological abuse nevertheless, even if they had a valid reason to do so.
Extreme methods of this kind are abuse in any case. I think in this case the word 'abuse' is somewhat misused/misdefied, like 'obsession' is mistaken for pure 'passuion', as in people always say they are obsessed with something or accuse others to be obsessed, even though the case would be just passion. As in deep, dedicative and with-all-heart love but not in a life altering way, plus also, in obsession the case barely ever is love in the first place anyway.
So, I'm not trying to turn down thos points all in all, they really are valid for what they're basically meant for. But I'm just saying "Edward is not abusive" is not a valid claim because he is regardless of the reasons why he does all those things to Bella.
But let's say, just for argument's sake, that everything the author says is true, and that Edward isn't abusive. That simply because he is a vampire somehow alters things. That doesn't change the fact that millions of girls are in love with his personality. The reality is, there are no vampires. If girls out there are looking for someone that personifies the same traits and qualities that Edward exemplifies, they will inevitably be drawn to abusive men. And I think that that's the reason so many people bring up the abusive theme in the books.
But I still think the relationship is abusive.
Her reasons (the fact that Edward loves her and was trying to protect her) do not take away from what he was doing.
And her Jake-hate seriously bothers me...
I still think Edward is an abusive boyfriend.
I was unaware I had even gone there...
registrarse en fanpop para agregar un comentario